3.5 stars out of 5
You ever read about something being the “best movie of the year” so you go and see it, and then you think, ‘well that was good but by no means the best movie of the year’? That’s me and Carol.
I must admit to not being that up on the Todd Haynes ouevre. The only film of his I’ve seen is Far From Heaven, which I’m pretty sure I liked; I don’t know, it was a while ago. But, when it comes to art-house Todds, I’m more a Solondz guy.
Now, Carol is based on a novel by Patricia Highsmith. She also wrote the books Strangers on a Train (hey! good Hitchcock flick!) and The Talented Mr. Ripley (a movie that started out good but became a convoluted mess). And in 1952, Carol (originally titled The Price of Salt) would’ve been a very edgy tale: two women in love coping with a world that doesn’t accept them.
The always-solid Cate Blanchett plays the title role. She’s an upper-class wife and mother who just can’t fake it anymore, damnit. (Why so blue, Jasmine?) Rooney Mara — and you can hardly see her dragon tattoo — is Therese the young shopgirl who dreams of something bigger, and also she just can’t fake it anymore, damnit. Though coming from different directions, they’re both ready to shake up their lives. Carol and Therese are drawn together, the heart wanting what it wants.
Ah, but Carol has a bit more baggage, with a young daughter and a sham of a marriage to Coach Taylor. (Always good to see Kyle Chandler, who here is all frustration boiling over into rage.) Plus there’s Sarah Paulson, just happy there are no circus freaks, witches, serial killers, or asylum dwellers about, as Carol’s confidante and former-but-maybe-not-former-enough flame.
So Carol can never quite be as free as she’d like. And it seemed to me — due to classism? ageism? becoming the thing you despise? — that Carol unconsciously tries to control Therese in much the same way that her husband tries to control her.
The film is gorgeously shot, evoking the early 1950s through a muted lens. There’s a pleasing dream-like quality to much of it, almost as if we’re in a dollhouse. There are also an awful lot of — windows. Haynes shooting through car windows, train windows…. So I’m thinking, ah ha, symbolism! Transportation representing reinvention? But no, Haynes just keeps shooting though glass: shop windows, characters gazing out windows, reflections of characters. And Therese is a wannabe photographer, so she’s not looking directly at people either. What does it all mean? I don’t know, man, I just don’t know.
The recurring musical theme, “Crossing” by Carter Burwell, is effectively haunting, if a bit familiar sounding.
Oh, one bit of casting b.s.: Carrie Brownstein of Sleater-Kinney and Portlandia is listed in the opening credits. Then she’s in the movie for about 4 seconds. What the hell?!?
Things happen, tension builds, more things happen (there’s a legal scene where I felt like a few pages had been skipped), and the movie ends. And I have to say, I wasn’t particularly moved. I respect the craft of the filmmaking and the lead performances (though neither Blanchett nor Mara is as strong as Brie Larson in Room). It’s a really well-made film, with a compelling relationship at its center, at a challenging moment in history. But, as a whole, Carol left me feeling kind of empty. Distant. Staring out a window, into the void.
Jack Silbert, curator